Rogue Advocates Submits Testimony on Proposed Changes to Rural Residential Zoning

House Bill 2655 has been introduced by representatives Zika, DB Smith and Owens and is scheduled for the House Committee on Housing on Thursday, February 4th at 8:00 a.m.
The summary of the bill is that it “prohibits counties from establishing minimum lot size of more than one acre for residential zoned land.”
Read Craig Anderson’s, Land Use Programs Manager, testimony submitted on behalf of Rogue Advocates at this link.
Excerpts from Craig’s testimony outline Rogue Advocates’ position on HB 2655.
- The line between what constitutes “rural” and “urban” residential development in Oregon is well- established. It is reflected in the planning documents used in every county in Oregon. It is reflected in over 40 years of case law. And it is reflected in the geography of our state. That line is 2 acres.
- Reasons this number was chosen include direct impacts on public health and safety.
- In Jackson County the minimum rural residential lot size is 2.5 acres. Residential lot sizes of a higher density (e.g., 1-acre minimum lot size) are considered “urban lands.” There are completely different provisions of state and local law that apply to these different densities. Entire communities are defined by these differences. Sewer line and sidewalk extensions – along with numerous other urban-level infrastructure and services – are planned and determined based on the line between “urban” and “rural.”
Read the full testimony here. For questions, contact Rogue Advocates at info@rogueadvocates.org.
Related Stories

Four Oregon Groups Ask Kotek to Stop Sunny Valley Gravel Mine on Grave Creek
A coalition of Rogue Advocates, WaterWatch of Oregon, Rogue Riverkeeper, and Friends of Country Living is urging Governor Tina Kotek to reject a deep-pit gravel operation on Grave Creek, a tributary of the Wild and Scenic Rogue River. Eighty to ninety feet deep. Within fifty feet of Grave Creek. That is the shape of what […]

Holding the Line, Building the Future: The Rogue Valley’s Stake in Oregon’s UGB Debate
A street ends at an empty field at the edge of Woodburn’s urban growth boundary. This empty field is now the potential site of a new housing development, a possibility with House Bill 4035. (Photo by Robin Linares/Oregon Capital Chronicle)

Defending Oregon’s Rural Heritage: Our Opposition to HB 2400, HB 2422, and HB 2316
Did you know Oregon has protected over 16 million acres of farmland since 1973? This shows our state’s dedication to keeping rural areas beautiful. But, three new bills – HB 2400, HB 2422, and HB 2316 – could change that. We strongly oppose these bills, fearing they could cause rural sprawl and harm our farming […]